DECEMBER
7, 2014
FIRST THOUGHTS
· The writer of
Esther is unknown.
·
Throughout
the book are indications of firsthand knowledge of the details of Persian Court
life. The name Esther is Persian meaning “star”.
·
Through
all the events that occurred in Esther, the theme is clear--God faithfully
preserved His people.
·
The
book is in the form of a story, but it is not just a story; it is inspired
Scripture.
UNDERSTAND THE
CONTEXT
·
The
first two chapters of Esther provided the setting for the story.
·
In
the third year of Xerxes kingship he removed Queen Vashti.
·
It
took four years before he installed Esther as his queen.
·
By
this time he had already gone to war against Greece and lost.
·
The
war with Greece occurred between these two events.
·
Esther
found herself caught up in a situation that was none of her own creation.
·
Esther
went through a full year of instruction in beauty and cosmetic preparation
before being presented to the king.
·
Every
member of the king’s harem went through the same process.
·
Perhaps
because of the devastating war with Greece, two servants plotted to kill the
king.
·
Mordecai
overhear do the plot and reported it to the king.
·
A
notation indicating Mordecai's assistance in saving the Kings life was recorded
in the official court records of the king.
·
It
is after all of these events that Hamon is introduced at the beginning of
chapter 3.
EXPLORE THE TEXT
ESTHER
3:1-9 NASB
VERSE 1:
After these events King Ahasuerus promoted Haman, the
son of Hammedatha the Agagite, and advanced him and established his authority
over all the princes who were
with him.
·
Agag
was the name of an Amalekite king that sought the destruction of the Jews during
the time of King Saul.
·
It
is suggested that Haman was a descendant of Agag; but it is just possible that
he is identified as an Agagite in the same way we refer to people who hate the
Jews as anti-Semitic.
·
It
is not known what Haman’s office was, but it is known that there was one who
stood in the king’s presence holding his weapon and there was another who was
the head of the king’s spies.
·
This
is suggestive of the report that was given Haman about Mordecai.
VERSE 2:
All the king's servants who were at the king's gate
bowed down and paid homage to Haman; for so the king had commanded concerning
him. But Mordecai neither bowed down nor paid homage.
“Herodotus reports that the Persians of equal
rank greeted one another with a kiss on the mouth. Someone of slightly lower
status would greet a superior with a kiss on the cheeks. If there was a great
difference in their status, prostration was the required protocol. Mordecai's
refusal is unlikely to concern inhibitions about worship, for there is no
suggestion that Mordecai had trouble prostrating himself before the king. The
Israelites were known to show deference through this sort of obeisance. Though
obeisance could be an act of worship, that was because it was a way of showing
reverence and respect. There was no inferred deification here. More likely is
that Mordecai was not willing to acknowledge the wide difference in status
between himself and Haman that the act would have implied.”
IVP Bible
Background
·
Since
Mordecai was at the king’s gate, he must have been an official of the king.
·
Mordecai
very likely bowed down to other officials of higher rank than him many times,
and certainly before the king.
·
The
root word “shachah” can sometimes refer to worship; but, it is often translated
as a show of respect, as it seems to mean that here.
·
Rather than religious reasons, it is possible
that Mordecai knew about Haman’s anti-semitism and could not bring himself to
show any homage or respect for such a man.
VERSE 3:
Then the king's servants who were at the king's gate
said to Mordecai, "Why are you transgressing the king's command?"
·
The
king was a man of quick anger, fear of arousing it would be pervasive among the
officials.
·
The
other officials did not understand why Mordecai was not obeying the king,s
command.
VERSE 4:
Now it was when they had spoken daily to him and he
would not listen to them, that they told Haman to see whether Mordecai's reason
would stand; for he had told them that he was a Jew.
“As a Jew, Mordecai may have not been able to
bring himself to show this sign of respect to one who was an ancestral enemy.”
Nelson’s
New Illustrated Bible Commentary
·
If
Mordecai was descended from Amalekites, then he was an ancestral enemy of the
Jews.
·
If
it was well known that Haman was anti-Semitic then Mordecai’s answer that he
was a Jew was sufficient for them to understand.
·
They
then began to distance themselves from Mordecai, and to back that up they then
informed Haman.
VERSE 5:
When Haman saw that Mordecai neither bowed down nor
paid homage to him, Haman was filled with rage.
·
Haman’s
rage was probably compounded when he realized that this had been going on for
some time and other officials could have been laughing at him behind his back.
·
This
was made all the more offensive to him because it was done by a Jew.
VERSE 6:
But he disdained to lay hands on Mordecai alone, for
they had told him who
the people of Mordecai were;
therefore Haman sought to destroy all the Jews, the people of Mordecai, who were throughout the whole
kingdom of Ahasuerus.
·
The
strong influence of demons in Haman’s life would also cause his anger to
increase to the level that the great enemy of God would attempt to wipe out
God’s plan.
VERSE 7:
In
the first month, which is the month Nisan, in the twelfth year of King
Ahasuerus, Pur, that is the lot, was cast before Haman from day to day and from
month to month,
until the twelfth month, that is the month Adar.
·
Because
of the time involved for Haman’s plan for revenge for Mordecai’s insult, he did
not seem concerned that other officials would follow Mordecai’s example.
·
Haman
attempt d to discern the right time to carry out his plan by casting lots in
the belief that his god would be pleased that he is consulting him and reveal
when the best time to carry out his plan.
·
Since
the lot had to be cast many times, it is obvious that no god was directing its
result except God in order to accomplishing God’s purpose.
VERSE 8:
Then Haman said to King Ahasuerus, "There is a
certain people scattered and dispersed among the peoples in all the provinces
of your kingdom; their laws are different from those of all other people and they do not observe the
king's laws, so it is not in the king's interest to let them remain.
·
The
great enemy of God is the father of lies, and he is most effective when he
includes enough truth to make the lie seem true too.
·
Yes
the Jews were dispersed among the provinces of the kingdom; yes the laws of the
Jews were different; but, they do not disobey the king’s laws.
VERSE 9:
"If it is pleasing to the king, let it be decreed
that they be destroyed, and I will pay ten thousand talents of silver into the
hands of those who carry on the king's business, to put into the king's treasuries."
·
An
appeal to the king’s vanity and fear of revolt along with a bribe that is
offered in a way as not to appear to be a bribe completes Haman’s presentation
to the king.
·
Just
a few years earlier the king led a disastrous war against Greece when they
revolted.
·
The
memory of this war would still linger in everyone’s mind.
No comments:
Post a Comment